Stop TANF-funded Marriage Programs

Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) (also known as welfare or public assistance) is an important part of our social contract to help parents and children in poverty.  Congress must vote on whether to continue TANF every five years. TANF is due to be reauthorized in 2010. 

When President Clinton "ended welfare as we knew it," he allowed Congress to state that the purposes of TANF include promoting marriage and two-parent families, and reducing births to unmarried parents.  Then the Bush Administration used TANF funds to give $150 million per year to hundreds of marriage programs around the country. 

Learn more about government-funded marriage programs.

Those programs are fighting hard to keep their grants flowing.  We must fight just as hard to put that money back into programs that are proven to ease the pain of poverty and help families leave poverty behind, regardless of their marital status.

The text in the shaded box below, plus the signatures and comments, will be delivered to federal officials during the TANF reauthorization process.

Please sign, share your experiences, and tell your friends!

Policies that aim to help children should support all the types of families in which children really live. It is wrong to use Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) to pay for marriage programs. Government is literally taking money away from impoverished families and giving it to programs that tell them their families are not good enough. There is no proof that marriage programs ease the burden of poverty or make low-income children better off. Marriage should be a personal choice, not a government mandate.

Congress should state that the purpose of TANF is to end poverty, not to promote marriage. Congress should not reauthorize the Healthy Marriage Initiatives.
Optional Member Code


1-25 of 242 signatures
Number Date Name Location If you have personal ...
242 Sat Nov 03 08:22:48 EDT 2012 Wendy Chrisman Columbus, OH
241 Tue Oct 23 02:32:00 EDT 2012 Christi Harper Chandler, OK I turned my exhusband in to Child Support Enforcement for failure to pay in 2007. It wasn't until two years later in 2009 that they finally suspended his drivers license! He was 2 years, a consecutive More....
240 Sun Apr 17 20:53:56 EDT 2011 Anonymous they shouldn't give the money to marriage programs, they should give it to the recipient to help pay for a wedding. If marriage really helps reduce poverty!
239 Wed Mar 23 12:41:01 EDT 2011 Carole Alexander Baltimore, MD n my long experience leading a domestic violence center, it is clear that marriage promotion programs are yet another institutional tool to control vulnerable women and children that leads to further violence More....
238 Sun Nov 28 02:23:00 EST 2010 Angi Becker MI
237 Sun Nov 21 04:50:12 EST 2010 Anonymous Marriage is a religious custom and should be neither supported, promoted, nor repressed by the State. It also has *nothing* to do with poverty, so it should not be part of TANF!
236 Tue Oct 05 14:30:31 EDT 2010 Anonymous WV
235 Fri Oct 01 17:59:16 EDT 2010 Anonymous CA
234 Thu Sep 09 14:03:21 EDT 2010 Valerie Lambert Dayton, oh
233 Thu Jul 22 16:26:28 EDT 2010 Anonymous CA
232 Sun Jun 20 17:23:50 EDT 2010 Rosa Friedman Bryn Mawr, PA
231 Wed Jun 09 18:55:17 EDT 2010 Anonymous New Bedford , MA
230 Sun Apr 25 07:00:10 EDT 2010 Elizabeth Mei Wong Knoxville, TN
229 Fri Apr 16 08:17:51 EDT 2010 Monica Pignotti Tallahassee, FL
228 Tue Apr 06 00:49:50 EDT 2010 Elisa Pelaccia Windsor, ON
227 Mon Apr 05 18:50:10 EDT 2010 Seema Desai Minneapolis, MN No personal TANF experience, but TANF's role is to provide a safety net, not to promote the institution of marriage. In a time when funding is limited, such resources should not be wasted on morality/normalcy More....
226 Mon Apr 05 18:26:58 EDT 2010 Desiree Hickson Colorado Springs, CO
225 Mon Apr 05 18:22:02 EDT 2010 Anonymous
224 Thu Mar 04 10:19:42 EST 2010 Vanessa Brocato Brooklyn, NY
223 Tue Mar 02 12:55:46 EST 2010 Anonymous
222 Tue Mar 02 11:57:28 EST 2010 Myra Batchelder Brooklyn, NY
221 Tue Feb 23 10:24:08 EST 2010 Anonymous
220 Mon Feb 22 22:55:07 EST 2010 Sandra Cunha New Bedford , MA
219 Sat Feb 20 01:00:19 EST 2010 Bobby Mauger Corvallis, OR Never had TANF myself, and hope to not need it, but as a happily unmarried person I cannot think of any reason either of our benefits should be tied to whether we ever marry.
218 Thu Feb 18 16:57:44 EST 2010 Kori Amos MO
Next ->
New name, new look — Alternatives to Marriage Project is now Unmarried Equality!Read More