About Us
Projects
Legislation
Events
Get Involved
Donate
Publcations & Press
Media Center
PCL Foundation
Contact Us

nwf logo

PCL E-Mail Blast Archive, 2008 -

PCL

Action Alert


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ACTION ALERT
 
Urge DPR to stop the backpedaling on regulations to reduce pesticide smog!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SUMMARY
 
On November 28th the Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) released new draft regulations to address smog-forming pesticides.  The draft regulations seriously backpedal on DPR's promise to reduce smog-forming pesticides in the five air basins across the state-especially in the San Joaquin Valley.  
 
Voice your opposition in writing by Jan 15th and in person at the public hearings January 12th in Bakersfield and January 14th in Sacramento.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ACTION
 
Take Action Now! Demand DPR comply fully with the Clean Air Act by reducing the use of smog-forming pesticides.
 
1) Send in your comments to DPR: DPR is accepting comments on their draft regulations until Thursday January 15th. Feel free to cut and paste or add your own words to the sample letter below.
 
Send comments to:
Fax: (916) 324-1452   
 
2) Attend a hearing: DPR is holding two public hearings to get feedback on their draft regulations. Come and demand strong regulations!
 
Monday, January 12, 2009 - Bakersfield, 5 p.m.,
                   Kern County Agricultural Pavilion, 3300 East Belle Terrace
Wednesday, January 14, 2009 -Sacramento, 1 p.m.,
Sierra Hearing Room, California Environmental Protection Agency      
headquarters, 1001 I St.
 
 
Thank you!
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BACKGROUND
 
Pesticides are one of the largest contributors to smog in the San Joaquin Valley and Ventura County, and a major contributor in the Southeast Desert, which includes the Coachella Valley. DPR should prioritize pesticide use reduction because pesticides are highly toxic, causing many mass farm worker and community poisonings, and volatile organic compounds (VOC) from pesticides contribute to smog and fine particulate matter formation. The only guaranteed way to reduce smog, particulate matter and toxic emissions from pesticides is to reduce pesticide use.
 
Ozone pollution-commonly called smog-is a summer time pollutant that damages lung tissue, exacerbates asthma, reduces lung capacity, increases respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions, and increases school and work absenteeism.  Fine particulate matter is a wintertime pollutant that exacerbates asthma and causes death in people with heart or lung disease.
 
The failure to meet smog and fine particle standards costs Valley residents at least $5.7 billon each year in health costs, or $1,600 per person. Agriculture-just like everyone else-needs to do its fair share to clean up the air.
 
Regulations to reduce the VOC from pesticides are long overdue. In the mid 1990's, California regulators promised to adopt regulations that would reduce VOC from pesticides by 20% below 1990 levels in five air basins by 2005. But the regulations did not keep their promise, leaving Californians to breathe polluted air.
 
The proposed regulations maintain the status quo and create a fiction of pollution reduction by manipulating the numbers to make it look as if necessary reductions have already been achieved. They do not meet the 20% reduction in VOC emissions promised in a 1996 commitment that EPA approved. DPR wants to break its promise to Californians by proposing to cut back VOC from pesticides by only 12% in the San Joaquin Valley. This violates federal law in the EPA-approved State Implementation Plan, the collection of rules and regulations that are supposed to achieve clean air standards for all Californians.
 
We must voice strong opposition to this backpedaling and promise-breaking, and demand that DPR adopt strong regulations to protect people's health. Californians deserve to breathe clean air.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
SAMPLE LETTER
 
Linda Irokawa-Otani, Regulations Coordinator
Department of Pesticide Regulation
1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4015
Sacramento, California 95812-4015
 
RE: DPR 08-006 Field Fumigant Emission Limits.
 
Dear Linda Irokawa-Otani:
 
I am writing to urge DPR to come up with regulations to reduce the use of volatile organic compound (VOC) pollution from pesticides. Reducing use is the only guaranteed way of reducing VOC emissions from pesticides.
 
VOC from pesticides causes smog and fine particle (PM2.5) air pollution and poisons communities with carcinogens and reproductive toxins, yet pesticide polluters have been getting a free ride for over a decade, leaving communities breathing dirty air.  Everyone needs to do their fair share to clean up our air. The Department of Pesticide Regulations needs to implement strong regulations in the San Joaquin Valley that are consistent with the rest of the state to reduce emissions from Volatile Organic Compound-emitting pesticides by at least 20% based on the 1990 year levels, before the next ozone season (May 2009).  Backsliding to 12% violates the EPA approved State Implementation Plan, the Clean Air Act, and leaves Valley residents unprotected from smog-forming pesticides. If DPR breaks its commitment to the San Joaquin Valley, it could easily backslide on regulations elsewhere.
 
Californians deserve to breathe clean air now!  The ongoing extensive use of pesticides that emit VOC is a major threat to the health of Californians.  Air pollution from smog and PM2.5 damages lung tissue, exacerbates asthma, reduces lung capacity, increases respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions, causes premature death, and increases school and work absenteeism.  The health costs for San Joaquin Valley residents from the failure to meet federal smog and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards - to which VOCs contribute - is $5.7 billion each year, or $1,600 per person per year. Many poor Valley residents lack access to health care, which places an additional and unfair burden on those who can least afford to bear the burden of air pollution and its health consequences.
 
It is long past the time for DPR to take real steps in reducing the use of all fumigant and non-fumigant VOC-emitting pesticides in agriculture, so our families can breathe the clean air to which they are entitled and avoid the billions in health costs. 
 
Name:
Organization:
Address:


1107 9th Street, Suite 360, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone (916) 444-8726 • Fax (916) 448-1789

pclmail@pcl.org www.PCL.org www.PCLFoundation.org

 


Please add pclmail@pcl.org to your address book to ensure delivery to your inbox.

You are receiving this email because the email address was subscribed to our email list.
Having trouble reading this email? View it on our website.

Copyright, 2008 The Planning and Conservation League. All rights reserved.
Privacy and Contribution Policies. Click here to unsubscribe

PCL Insider Archive, 2005 - 2008

Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 28, 2008 2008-03-18
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 18, 2008 2008-03-18
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 13, 2008 2008-03-13
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 6, 2008 2008-03-06
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 29, 2008 2008-02-29
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 22, 2008 2008-02-22
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 15, 2008 2008-02-15
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 8, 2008 2008-02-08
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 3, 2008 2008-02-03
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 25, 2008 2008-01-25
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 18, 2008 2008-01-18
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 10, 2008 2008-01-10
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 4, 2008 2008-01-04
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 20, 2007 2007-12-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 13, 2007 2007-12-13
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 7, 2007 2007-12-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 30, 2007 2007-11-30
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 21, 2007 2007-11-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 2, 2007 2007-11-16
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 2, 2007 2007-11-02
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 26, 2007 2007-10-26
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 18, 2007 2007-10-18
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 11, 2007 2007-10-11
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 4, 2007 2007-10-04
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 28, 2007 2007-09-28
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 21, 2007 2007-09-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 13, 2007 2007-09-13
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 7, 2007 2007-09-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 31, 2007 2007-08-31
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 23, 2007 2007-08-23
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 17, 2007 2007-08-17
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 9, 2007 2007-08-09
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 2, 2007 2007-08-02
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 27, 2007 2007-07-27
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 19, 2007 2007-07-19
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 12, 2007 2007-07-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 6, 2007 2007-07-06
Planning & Conservation League Insider: SPECIAL EDITION 2007-06-28
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 21, 2007 2007-06-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 14, 2007 2007-06-14
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 07, 2007 2007-06-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 31, 2007 2007-05-31
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 24, 2007 2007-05-24
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 17, 2007 2007-05-17
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 10, 2007 2007-05-10
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 27, 2007 2007-04-27
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 20, 2007 2007-04-20
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 12, 2007 2007-04-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 5, 2007 2007-04-05
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 29, 2007 2007-03-29
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 22, 2007 2007-03-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 15, 2007 2007-03-15
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 28, 2007 2007-02-28
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 22, 2007 2007-02-22
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 14, 2007 2007-02-14
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 7, 2007 2007-02-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 31, 2007 2007-01-31
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 24, 2007 2007-01-24
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 18, 2007 2007-01-17
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 9, 2007 2007-01-09
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 3, 2007 2007-01-03
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 20, 2006 2006-12-20
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 12, 2006 2006-12-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 5, 2006 2006-12-05
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 28, 2006 2006-11-28
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 22, 2006 2006-11-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 14, 2006 2006-11-14
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 7, 2006 2006-11-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 31, 2006 2006-10-31
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 25, 2006 2006-10-25
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 17, 2006 2006-10-17
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 10, 2006 2006-10-10
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 2, 2006 2006-10-03
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 26, 2006 2006-09-26
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 19, 2006 2006-09-19
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 12, 2006 2006-09-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 6, 2006 2006-09-06
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 31, 2006 - Special AB 32 Edition! 2006-08-31
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 29, 2006 2006-08-29
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 22, 2006 2006-08-22
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 15, 2006 2006-08-15
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 8, 2006 2006-08-08
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 1, 2006 2006-08-01
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 25, 2006 2006-07-25
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 18, 2006 2006-07-18
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 11, 2006 2006-07-11
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 7, 2006 2006-07-06
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 27, 2006 2006-06-27
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 20, 2006 2006-06-20
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 13, 2006 2006-06-13
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 6, 2006 2006-06-05
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 31, 2006 2006-05-31
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 23, 2006 2006-05-23
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 16, 2006 2006-05-16
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 9, 2006 2006-05-09
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 3, 2006 2006-05-03
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 25, 2006 2006-04-25
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 18, 2006 2006-04-18
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 11, 2006 2006-04-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 4, 2006 2006-04-04
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 28, 2006 2006-03-28
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 21, 2006 2006-03-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 14, 2006 2006-03-14
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 7, 2006 2006-03-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 28, 2006 2006-02-28
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 22, 2006 2006-02-22
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 14, 2006 2006-02-13
Planning & Conservation League Insider: February 7, 2006 2006-02-06
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 31, 2006 2006-01-31
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 24, 2006 2006-01-23
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 18, 2006 2006-01-17
Planning & Conservation League Insider: January 10, 2006 2006-01-10
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 20, 2005 2005-12-20
Planning & Conservation League Insider: December 9, 2005 2005-12-09
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 10, 2005 2005-11-10
Planning & Conservation League Insider: November 1, 2005 2005-11-01
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 12, 2005 2005-10-26
Planning & Conservation League Insider: October 12, 2005 2005-10-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 29, 2005 2005-09-29
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 20, 2005 2005-09-20
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 13, 2005 2005-09-13
Planning & Conservation League Insider: September 7, 2005 2005-09-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 30, 2005 2005-08-29
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 23, 2005 2005-08-23
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 16, 2005 2005-08-16
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 9, 2005 2005-08-09
Planning & Conservation League Insider: August 2, 2005 2005-08-02
Planning & Conservation League Insider, Special Edition: July 28, 2005 2005-07-27
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 26, 2005 2005-07-26
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 19, 2005 2005-07-19
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 12, 2005 2005-07-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: July 6, 2005 2005-07-05
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 28, 2005 2005-06-28
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 21, 2005 2005-06-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 15, 2005 2005-06-15
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 7, 2005 2005-06-07
Planning & Conservation League Insider: June 1, 2005 2005-06-01
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 24, 2005 2005-05-23
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 17, 2005 2005-05-17
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 10, 2005 2005-05-09
Planning & Conservation League Insider: May 3, 2005 2005-05-02
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 26, 2005 2005-04-25
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 19, 2005 2005-04-19
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 11, 2005 2005-04-12
Planning & Conservation League Insider: April 5, 2005 2005-04-04
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 29, 2005 2005-03-29
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 22, 2005 2005-03-21
Planning & Conservation League Insider: March 15, 2005 2005-03-14
Planning & Conservation League Insider: News from the Capitol 2005-03-07

HomeAbout UsProgramsLegislationEventsGet Involved
Become a Member
PublicationsMedia CenterPCL FoundationContact UsSite Map

1107 9th Street, Suite 360, Sacramento, CA 95814 • Phone (916) 444-8726 • Fax (916) 448-1789 •

Copyright • 2008 The Planning and Conservation League. All rights reserved. Privacy and Contribution Policies To report problems with or to ask questions about our website, please email pclmail@pcl.org.