Stop Shipment of Radioactive Components through Great Lakes
Resolution to Stop Shipment of Radioactive Nuclear Power Steam Generators on the Great Lakes & Dispersal into Consumer Goods
Canada's Bruce Power wants to ship 32 huge radioactive steam generators (16 are proposed to be shipped in the fall of 2010) through the Great Lakes and on to Sweden, where they will be processed by a company called Studsvik. The most highly radioactive pieces would then be shipped back through the Great Lakes to Canada, while Studsvik would "recycle" the less radioactive pieces into metals that could enter the consumer marketplace.
Below is a detailed resolution in opposition to this plan, which would endanger the Great Lakes and people across the entire world. We hope everyone will sign it.
Resolution to Stop Shipment of Radioactive Nuclear Power Steam Generators on the Great Lakes & Dispersal into Consumer Goods
WHEREAS Bruce Power is engaged in a multibillion dollar refurbishment project involving several of the eight Bruce nuclear reactors on Lake Huron;
WHEREAS this refurbishment project involves the removal and replacement of thousands of corroded and radioactively contaminated tubes and pipes in the primary cooling circuits of the affected reactors, which will remain on-site as radioactive wastes;
WHEREAS the refurbishment also involves the removal and replacement of 32 huge radioactive steam generators, each weighing approximately 100 tonnes, each about the size of a school bus, and each containing thousands of radioactively contaminated pipes which carried primary coolant from the core of the nuclear reactor;
WHEREAS the pipes inside the old steam generators are contaminated with radioactive fission products, such as cobalt-60 and cesium-137, with radioactive actinides, such as plutonium, americium, and curium, and with radioactive activation products, such as tritium (hydrogen-3) &carbon-14;
WHEREAS the radioactive contaminants inside the old steam generators include alpha-emitters, beta- emitters and gamma-emitters, some of which have half-lives measured in decades, centuries or even millennia;
WHEREAS the decontamination efforts carried out by Bruce Power have not succeeded in removing all radioactive contamination from these old steam generators;
WHEREAS Bruce Power has signed a contract with the Studsvik company in Sweden to receive and dismantle 32 of these old radioactive steam generators from the Bruce Nuclear Complex, to “recycle” as much of the less radioactive metal as possible for commercial use as scrap metal (up to 90 percent of the total metal in the steam generators), and to return the more radioactive portions to Bruce Power to be stored as radioactive waste;
WHEREAS the recycling of radioactive materials from nuclear reactors as scrap metal for commercial use should not be countenanced or encouraged;
WHEREAS Bruce Power has announced that it intends to ship the old steam generators through the Great Lakes, down the St. Lawrence River, and across the Atlantic Ocean to Studsvik in Sweden;
WHEREAS Studsvik intends to return the most radioactive portions back to Bruce Power, presumably following the same route through the St. Lawrence River and the Great Lakes;
WHEREAS shipping radioactive waste through the Great Lakes is a practice which should be not be allowed because of the potential for long-lived radioactive contamination;
WHEREAS the stigma attached to shipments of radioactive waste materials will affect people's peace of mind and property values along the transportation route, especially if an accident involving those shipments were to occur;
WHEREAS the shipment of old steam generators through the Great Lakes will set a dangerous precedent for other shipments of radioactive waste materials in future;
WHEREAS the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River system together comprise close to 20% of the world's surface freshwater; and are a source of drinking water for over 40 million people and a $4 billion fisheries; and which support an amazingly diverse and fragile ecosystem;
WHEREAS the Great Lakes are currently compromised by radioactive contaminations through routine emissions and accidental releases at upwards of 50 nuclear sites. This radioactive burden continues to this day and should not be compounded and endorsed by radioactive steam generator shipments.
WHEREAS Bruce Power’s plan for transporting radioactive steam generators to Sweden has never come under public scrutiny, either by citizens and local governments along the trucking and shipping routes, or by provincial, state or national governments - including indigenous and sovereign First Nation and Tribal governments - along the waterways of the proposed Great Lakes/St.-Lawrence route, or by international bodies such as the IJC;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED
that the organizations and individuals listed:
(1) are opposed in principle to any shipment through the Great Lakes of radioactive waste or radioactively contaminated equipment from the decommissioning, refurbishment, or routine operation of nuclear reactors;
(2) urge the governments of Canada and the U.S.A., as well as indigenous and sovereign First Nation and Tribal governments along the proposed shipment routes, as well as the governments of provinces and states adjacent to the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River, to insist that the shipment of old nuclear steam generators through the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River not be allowed to take place;
(3) urge the governments to recognize used nuclear steam generators as radioactive waste; they have always been regarded as radioactive waste and should always be regarded as radioactive waste.
(4) urge that these authorities declare that radioactive wastes and radioactively contaminated equipment from decommissioned or refurbished nuclear reactors, or from routine operation of nuclear reactors, shall not be allowed to be shipped through the Great Lakes or the St. Lawrence River.
1-25
of 4008 signatures
Number
Date
Name
Organization
Location
4008
Sat Oct 13 11:43:52 EDT 2012
margarida pimentel
recife,
ot
4007
Sat Oct 13 11:40:05 EDT 2012
Germana Pimentel
recife,
ot
4006
Sat Oct 13 11:35:12 EDT 2012
margarida pimentel
recife,
ot
4005
Sat Oct 13 11:34:33 EDT 2012
cristiane pimentel
recife,
ot
4004
Wed Sep 12 15:59:48 EDT 2012
Anonymous
pensacola,
FL
This is so bad, the poor animals and the problems this will cause.
4003
Wed Jun 06 00:06:01 EDT 2012
Kerry Brewer
Douglas,
MB
4002
Sat May 05 23:45:06 EDT 2012
Ronda Sonier
Hamilton,
ON
4001
Thu Apr 26 16:19:58 EDT 2012
Anonymous
Toronto,
ON
209 -->208Can man hardly recognize, the Devil of his creaton? Water is one of our most valuable resources!! Is this the way we take care of our Earth?? What about our childrens future??? No water, no survival!!!
4000
Thu Apr 26 11:26:34 EDT 2012
Lynn Reeser
Vernon,
FL
3999
Thu Mar 22 16:44:49 EDT 2012
Beth Kaplan
n/a
Worcester,
MA
I think this idea is the worst possible. We rely on water for our very lives; if there's no safe, drinkable water, we're in BIG trouble and will die in a hurry. Moreover, the situation set in motion by More....a "floating train-wreck" of radioactivity moving through the Great Lakes, at risk of being set upon by terrorists, or sinking in the Lakes' infamous wild storms, is not something any of us would want to see happen. Plus they have no business trading heavily
radioactive metal almost fresh from a reactor to sell for scrap metal - virtually all these elements present in the metal are highly
toxic, and all target various areas of the body. Children are especially vulnerable; this is akin to exposing them to the effects of at least one bomb's worth of toxicity *before* the world has even been destroyed. Just imagine the widespread effect if the
radioactive metal is broken up into all manner of objects, the dispersal of which can't be traced? Spoons, knives, forks, keyrings,
etc., etc., ad nauseum, because radiation clings particularly easily
to metal...
3998
Tue Mar 13 14:04:07 EDT 2012
Chrystal Coleman
Vista,
CA
3997
Sun Mar 04 06:58:43 EST 2012
Karly Burch
Pukalani,
HI
3996
Sat Mar 03 13:43:17 EST 2012
Thomas Adesko
Stockholm,
ot
Please prevent the shipment of radioactive equipment from the Great Lakes region to Sweden for processing.
3995
Sat Mar 03 12:35:09 EST 2012
Marianne Widmalm
Ann Arbor,
MI
3994
Sat Mar 03 00:10:59 EST 2012
Eileen Mahood-Jose
Little Ferry,
NJ
3993
Fri Mar 02 21:57:48 EST 2012
Stephanie Salagan
Montreal,
QC
3992
Fri Mar 02 21:11:45 EST 2012
Deb Reed
Des Moines,
WA
PLEASE Stop Shipments of Radioactive Nuclear Waste...
3991
Fri Mar 02 20:49:38 EST 2012
Diane Steele
Farmington,
MN
3990
Fri Mar 02 20:14:08 EST 2012
Moisha Blechman
Sierra Club
Ancram,
NY
3989
Fri Mar 02 20:11:13 EST 2012
Patricia Matejcek
Sierra Club
Santa Cruz,
CA
3988
Fri Mar 02 19:37:07 EST 2012
andrea lieberman
coalition against nukes
water mill,
NY
3987
Fri Mar 02 18:59:26 EST 2012
Henry Peters
Concerned Citizen
Ewen,
MI
For the International Joint Commission (IJC), a binational treaty organization, constructed for protecting for cleanliness of the boundary waters between the U.S. & Canada; for persistant toxic More....substances, utilizing the precautionary principle, the only acceptable level of discharge shall be zero discharge. The potential for release of radioactive substances, such as proposed here itemized, by shipping long lived radioactive items through the Great Lakes, should therefore be held to this standard: ZERO DISCHARGE (i.e., don't do it).
3986
Fri Mar 02 18:58:59 EST 2012
Ann Farr
Acton,
ME
We don't want your radioactive metal. You made money off of it, now dispose of it in your own backyard.