| Number |
Date |
Name |
Why are you opposed to the ... |
| 324 |
Fri May 03 11:18:25 EDT 2013 |
kristine corrigan corrigan |
There is zero future vision of impact on enviroment and our own sustainability to maintain the bounty ,beauty and rights of public and private land that we have here ,to export!! $$ to a select few and More....forign markets .Reckless and dangerous proposal!!! |
| 323 |
Mon Apr 22 18:58:20 EDT 2013 |
Alexander Jones |
I am relocating to Grants Pass as a farmer within the next year and would be deeply affected as all pipelines promote an unwise extraction of resources as higher rates that we can use, thus export becomes More....integral. We are using LNG, however we do not need to export it or run it through new pipelines in order to fill a demand in lands abroad. All pipelines leak, all communities are affected, no matter how rich or poor. These profits will not benefit Oregon's public, they will benefit a very few already wealthy businesses whom are denying the right to health and safety for the whole of us, including themselves. Local contractors can be utilized in alternate ways, building infrastructure we need to live, not to export LNG. |
| 322 |
Mon Apr 15 22:18:18 EDT 2013 |
Rob M. |
PROTECT God's SACRED CREATION. |
| 321 |
Mon Apr 15 16:07:59 EDT 2013 |
monica colomar |
|
| 320 |
Tue Mar 26 00:40:09 EDT 2013 |
Pamela Ordway |
This pipeline would go directly through land owned by my family and myself. This land has been in our family for generations and we have preserved it as farmland and forestland with the intention of More....passing it onto the next generation. We are not at all interested in having to be forced to allow a for profit company be able to condemn portions of our land and do not want to violate the property and restrict the ability of us to use the property to its fullest potential in the future. |
| 319 |
Tue Mar 26 00:40:08 EDT 2013 |
Pamela Ordway |
This pipeline would go directly through land owned by my family and myself. This land has been in our family for generations and we have preserved it as farmland and forestland with the intention of More....passing it onto the next generation. We are not at all interested in having to be forced to allow a for profit company be able to condemn portions of our land and do not want to violate the property and restrict the ability of us to use the property to its fullest potential in the future. |
| 318 |
Tue Mar 26 00:39:04 EDT 2013 |
Pamela Ordway |
This pipeline would go directly through land owned by my family and myself. This land has been in our family for generations and we have preserved it as farmland and forestland with the intention of More....passing it onto the next generation. We are not at all interested in having to be forced to allow a for profit company be able to condemn portions of our land and do not want to violate the property and restrict the ability of us to use the property to its fullest potential in the future. |
| 317 |
Sun Mar 10 00:00:48 EST 2013 |
Bron Harris |
|
| 316 |
Mon Feb 18 20:43:23 EST 2013 |
Isabel Santamaria |
|
| 315 |
Mon Feb 18 20:42:32 EST 2013 |
Isabel Santamaria |
|
| 314 |
Mon Feb 18 13:50:01 EST 2013 |
Steve Lanusse-Siegel |
|
| 313 |
Mon Feb 18 13:04:14 EST 2013 |
Anonymous |
The ecosystems of Oregon are vital to all of our health. Please do not disturb the natural balance for greed and profit. |
| 312 |
Mon Feb 18 10:43:28 EST 2013 |
melissa giersbach |
|
| 311 |
Mon Feb 18 10:28:08 EST 2013 |
Monica Fioretti |
I am opposed to the rivers being threatened and contaminated. |
| 310 |
Mon Feb 18 01:26:41 EST 2013 |
Amy Summers |
Non sensical |
| 309 |
Mon Feb 18 01:19:44 EST 2013 |
Anonymous |
|
| 308 |
Sun Feb 17 23:33:23 EST 2013 |
Jacob Wyatt |
I feel these endeavors have outlived their longterm usefulness, and in fact are extremely short-sited. I hope our leaders see sense soon and consider radical meaningful change. |
| 307 |
Sun Feb 17 23:19:53 EST 2013 |
Heather Larsen |
215 -->214Rivers and streams and the health of the eco-system as a whole as far more critical to our quality of life than the selling of natural gas to asia. There must be a better way! Let's get creative, not destructive!!! |
| 306 |
Sun Feb 17 22:34:05 EST 2013 |
Donna Dove |
Stop seizing private property for a foreign country to send our fuel where you sent all our jobs. NO LNG, NO WAY! |
| 305 |
Fri Jan 04 15:26:49 EST 2013 |
Karen Olsen |
Exporting our resources with no value added is not good economic policy. Causing harm to Oregon's tourist attracting environment is not good economic policy either. |
| 304 |
Thu Jan 03 20:41:14 EST 2013 |
Steven Tichenor |
|
| 303 |
Mon Dec 31 13:25:41 EST 2012 |
Sandra Alcantara |
Greed versus our valued, wonderful, natural areas. |
| 302 |
Mon Dec 03 15:36:41 EST 2012 |
Marilyn Madden |
It would ruin southern Oregon, not only its beauty but its wildlife habitat-including that of salmon--and the quality of our water. |
| 301 |
Thu Nov 29 23:51:31 EST 2012 |
Ann Tibbot |
It's unjust to the landowners, wildlife, & those who enjoy this region for recreational activities. No one should have their homes destroyed in the name of greed! |
| 300 |
Tue Nov 27 16:56:41 EST 2012 |
Anonymous |
At a time when our country needs to maximize domestic energy production, this project would instead ship it overseas. The construction and maintenance of the pipeline would cause serious environmental More....damage. We do not need this pipeline and terminal! |